MEMS and Sensors

Samsung, TSMC lobby for inclusion in CHIPS for America Act

31 March 2022
An Intel engineer examines a semiconductor wafer at a fab. With new funding on the horizon for semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S., TSMC and Samsung want a piece of the pie. Source: Intel

Two leading semiconductor manufacturers, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and Samsung Electronics Co., have called on the U.S. government to allow foreign companies to participate in the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS Act) for America Act.

The CHIPS Act would provide more than $52 billion to invest in domestic U.S. chip manufacturing and research. The bipartisan act aims to enhance the competitiveness of the U.S. by promoting American science and technology leadership.

Both the Senate and the House have passed versions of the CHIPS Act but differ on specific provisions. And just this week, the Senate approved the bill again, which will send the legislation back to the House of Representatives to launch a formal process to seek a compromised version of both houses of Congress. Once the compromised version is complete, it would be sent to President Joe Biden to sign it into law.

TSMC and Samsung are currently both building fabs in the U.S. TSMC recently broke ground on its $12 billion fab in Arizona while Samsung chose Taylor, Texas, to build its $17 billion facility last year.

Incentives needed

However, according to a new report from DigiTimes Asia, TSMC may not be able to generate profits from its fab in Arizona when it becomes operational without subsidies and support.

Therefore, TSMC said in a statement that the CHIPS Act “should be implemented in a way that any company in the semiconductor ecosystem capable of enhancing U.S. supply chain resilience is eligible to apply for and receive such incentives.”

Additionally, TSMC said this would encourage a level playing field and encourage investment in the U.S. for manufacturing activities such as fab construction. Allowing overseas companies access to incentives and support would help create a virtuous cycle to reduce operational costs and attract even more investments.

Samsung echoed TSMC with its own statement to the U.S. government. The company said its $17 billion investment in Texas represents one of the largest foreign direct investments in U.S. history, which will support the supply chain and create more than 2,000 jobs as well as thousands of support jobs.

Samsung said five factors should be considered when evaluating grant applications:

  1. Potential impact of the proposal.
  2. How the applicant proposes to advance the U.S. strategic goals.
  3. Past history of investments in the U.S. chip manufacturing facilities and record of multi-billion projects.
  4. Proposed investments in programs to expand U.S. employment opportunities.
  5. Sustainability practices.

“At its core, Samsung’s significant investment in the U.S. semiconductor manufacturing industry is strengthening semiconductor supply chain, invigorating research and development, and supporting the growth of skilled workforce in America,” Samsung said in a statement.

Therefore, the U.S. government should measure what investments go to which qualifying companies, regardless of that company’s origin, based on merit and to fund an “even playing field.”

TSMC and Samsung’s concern comes from Intel Corp. suggesting last year that U.S. taxpayers’ money should only go to domestic companies. However, it is not a point Intel has made frequently.

Intel building

When the pandemic revealed flaws in the aggregation of semiconductor manufacturing, which is mostly located in Taiwan, China and Korea, Intel began making moves to increase its manufacturing prowess, building four fabs in North America — two in Arizona and two in Ohio — as well as expanding into the foundry business.

According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), the U.S. manufactures about 12% of all chips made globally, this is down from about 37% in the 1990s. If the supply chain remains the same or the situation worsens, this will more than likely decline to 10% or less in the coming years as more manufacturing capacity is built in other countries to meet demand.

The decline is due to substantial incentives offered by foreign governments, placing the U.S. in a competitive disadvantage for attracting new construction of chip manufacturing fabs. While other governments have invested substantially in research initiatives, the U.S. tax incentives lag. Intel is seeking the U.S. to eventually manufacture one-third of all semiconductors globally.

To fight against potential problems that may crop up in the future — whether it be a future pandemic or other geopolitical issues — the goal is to diversify where semiconductors are manufactured to curb the impact on the supply chain.

To contact the author of this article, email PBrown@globalspec.com


Powered by CR4, the Engineering Community

Discussion – 0 comments

By posting a comment you confirm that you have read and accept our Posting Rules and Terms of Use.
Engineering Newsletter Signup
Get the Engineering360
Stay up to date on:
Features the top stories, latest news, charts, insights and more on the end-to-end electronics value chain.
Advertisement
Weekly Newsletter
Get news, research, and analysis
on the Electronics industry in your
inbox every week - for FREE
Sign up for our FREE eNewsletter
Advertisement