Acquired Electronics360

Industrial Electronics

New Generation of Pests are Resistant to Biotech Crops

10 October 2017

In 2016, farmers all over the world planted more than 240 million acres of genetically modified corn, cotton and soybeans that produce insect-killing proteins from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt. These Bt) -- proteins that kill some greedy caterpillar and beetle pests. These pests are generally harmless to people and are considered environmentally friendly. While organic farmers have used Bt proteins in sprays for more than 50 years, some scientists feared that widespread use of Bt proteins in genetically engineered crops would start a rapid evolution of resistance in pests.

The caterpillar pest Helicoverpa zea (also known as cotton bollworm and corn earworm) has evolved resistance to four Bt proteins produced by biotech crops. (Alex Yelich/University of Arizona)The caterpillar pest Helicoverpa zea (also known as cotton bollworm and corn earworm) has evolved resistance to four Bt proteins produced by biotech crops. (Alex Yelich/University of Arizona)

Researchers at the University of Arizona in Tuscon, have started to address this concern and discover why the pests adapted quickly in some cases, but not others. To test predictions about resistance, Bruce Tabashnik and Yves Carriere in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences analyzed global data on the Bt crop use and pest responses.

"When Bt crops were first introduced in 1996, no one knew how quickly the pests would adapt," said Tabashnik, a Regents' professor and head of the UA Department of Entomology. "Now we have a cumulative total of over 2 billion acres of these crops planted during the past two decades and extensive monitoring data, so we can build a scientific understanding of how fast the pests evolve resistance and why."

The researchers analyzed published data for 35 cases representing responses of 15 pest species in 10 countries on every continent except Antarctica. They discovered resistance that substantially reduced the efficacy of the Bt crops in the field in 16 cases as of 2016, compared to three cases by 2005. In the 16 cases, pests evolved resistance in an average time of five years.

"A silver lining is that in 17 other cases, pests have not evolved resistance to Bt crops," Tabashnik said. He added that some crops continue to remain effective after 20 years. The remaining three cases are classified as "early warning of resistance," where the resistance is statistically significant, but not severe enough to have practical consequences.

"This paper provides us with strong evidence that the high-dose/refuge strategy for delaying resistance to Bt crops is really working," said Fred Gould, professor of entomology at North Carolina State University and leader of the 2016 National Academy of Sciences study on genetically engineered crops. "This will be critically important information as more crops are engineered to produce Bt toxins."

According to the paper, the best and worst outcomes support predictions from evolutionary principles.

"As expected from evolutionary theory, factors favoring sustained efficacy of Bt crops were a recessive inheritance of resistance in pests and abundant refuges," Carriere said.

Refuges consist of standard, non-Bt plants that pests can eat without exposure to Bt toxins. Planting refuges near Bt crops reduce the changes that two resistant insects will mate with each other which makes it more likely they will breed with a susceptible mate. With recessive inheritance, matings between a resistant parent and a susceptible parent yield offspring that are killed by the Bt crop.

"Computer models showed that refuges should be especially good for delaying resistance when the inheritance of resistance in the pest is recessive," Carriere explained.

The value of refuges has been controversial and the Environmental Protection Agency has relaxed its requirements for planting refuges in the U.S.

"Perhaps the most compelling evidence that refuges work comes from the pink bollworm, which evolved resistance rapidly to Bt cotton in India, but not in the U.S.," Tabashnik said.

In the southwestern U.S., farmers collaborated with academia, industry, EPA scientists and the U.S. Department of Agriculture to implement an effective refuge strategy.

The study revealed that pest resistance to Bt crops is evolving faster now than before, mostly because resistance to some Bt proteins causes cross-resistance to related Bt proteins produced by subsequently introduced crops.

A development is the recent commercialization of biotech crops producing a novel type of Bt protein called a vegetative insecticidal protein, or Vip. All other Bt proteins in genetically engineered crops are in another group called crystalline, or Cry proteins. Because these two groups of Bt proteins are so different, cross-resistance between them is low, or nil.

"This review provides a timely update on the global status of resistance to Bt crops and unique insights that will help to improve resistance management strategies for more sustainable use of Bt crops," said Yidong Wu, distinguished professor in the College of Plant Protection at Nanjing Agricultural University in China.

The new report is the most comprehensive evaluation of pest resistance to Bt crops so far, Tabashnik indicated it represents only the beginning of using systematic data analyses to enhance understanding and management of resistance.

"These plants have been remarkably useful, and resistance has generally evolved slower than most people expected," he said. "I see these crops as an increasingly important part of the future of agriculture. The progress made provides motivation to collect more data and to incorporate it in planning future crop deployments."

"We've also started exchanging ideas and information with scientists facing related challenges, such as resistance to herbicides in weeds and resistance to drugs in cancer cells," Tabashnik added.

A paper on this research was published in the October issue of Nature Biotechnology.

To contact the author of this article, email Siobhan.Treacy@ieeeglobalspec.com


Powered by CR4, the Engineering Community

Discussion – 0 comments

By posting a comment you confirm that you have read and accept our Posting Rules and Terms of Use.
Engineering Newsletter Signup
Get the Engineering360
Stay up to date on:
Features the top stories, latest news, charts, insights and more on the end-to-end electronics value chain.
Advertisement
Weekly Newsletter
Get news, research, and analysis
on the Electronics industry in your
inbox every week - for FREE
Sign up for our FREE eNewsletter
Advertisement

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

Date Event Location
23-27 Apr 2018 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
18-22 Jun 2018 Honolulu, Hawaii
Find Free Electronics Datasheets
Advertisement